data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9229c/9229cf499ffb2f81103b532d5f1660e5adaa0ac3" alt="Intel e1000 nic"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a76d/9a76dc7460e0b443f6b6d9ffd46904fb36237fcc" alt="intel e1000 nic intel e1000 nic"
Your name and email address will not be added to any mailing list, and you will not receive email from Intel Corporation unless requested. Apr 30, Posts, Select the driver you want to install. The integrated on-board Ethernet support includes the manufacturer. The use, The machine installed just fine. I made the boot disk using the wizard and selected the driver Intel Pro 1000. I also went to Intel's site and searched for a driver for the Intel Pro 1000 CT and they don't. Sys/dev/e1000/if_em.It is not used, since the NDIS2 driver is used instead. Tested by: kbowling (I210 lagg), markj (I210) Intentions of previous bug fix attempts became clearer. Some clarification and improvement for igb-class devices once the This work was primarily done to address the referenced PR, but inspired Mode, so we need to set and re-arm the 'Other' bit during attach andĪfter ICR reads in the FAST handler if not an LSC or after handling on To take advantage of autoclear (EIAC) single shot behavior.Ĩ2574 uses 'Other' in ICR and IMS for LSC interrupt types when in MSI-X In MSI-X mode, 82574 and igb-class devices use an interrupt filter to * Clarify spurious/other interrupt re-arms in FAST. * Move igb-class LSC re-arming out of FAST back into the handler. * Fix 82574 Link Status Changes, carrying the OTHER mask bit around as Settling for anything other than what is attached to this ticket is risky, especially if there is nobody who can test and verify this in over one and a half years.Ī commit in branch main references this bug:Ĭommit eea55de7b10808b86277d7fdbed2d05d3c6db1b2Į1000: Rework em_msi_link interrupt filter It took a long time to identify the commit that was responsible and unwind it (it was a batch MFC after all). I don't think this is sensible for the simple reason that this was introduced in stable/10, went into 10.3 unnoticed, breaking *a lot* of embedded hardware with regard to e.g. I asked for a full revert to the working Intel state via e-mail, but that didn't happen. We circled around a minimal patch (note the attached patch reverts to the full Intel driver change), but the weirdness that is "adapter->ims" for just this one chipset code path still makes no sense in the grand scheme of things.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/acb14/acb14d81258c197e8caf823a4c50a5505b1e4fb9" alt="intel e1000 nic intel e1000 nic"
All branches received a modified patch that came up inconclusive in testing, overshadowed by the iflib conversion and multiple build and subsystem failures due to it.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9229c/9229cf499ffb2f81103b532d5f1660e5adaa0ac3" alt="Intel e1000 nic"